Why the plan for quality monitoring and evaluation in teaching is so important.?
The new global scenarios directly affect all social organizations and force them to undertake rapid transformations. Education is not alien to this phenomenon and, for this reason, the education system faces important challenges to provide timely and relevant responses to the new training needs of citizens for the 21st century.
Construction
West-Burnham (1994b) argues that this need not be the case:
1. In schools, individuals may work at all three levels. 2. The process is
dynamic, depending upon interaction between levels. 3. A hierarchy of functions
does not necessarily require a hierarchy in status. 4. The project or taskforce
may be an ideal way to solve problems and generate policies.
How can an educational follow-up plan be organized?
- Define the competences, they mark the way we want to go.
- Articulate the educational project (PEI) with the quality standards, to meet these quality goals
- Study the different state tests from elementary to 11th grade
- Diagnose the test result
- Depending on the results of the institution, the team will be analyzed, and the teams will
- Review the individual contributions of managers and teachers.
- The individual evaluation serves to review what has been or what should be the contribution, to be in the dynamics and improve as a team.
The team must work around global objectives and individually. Each one must give his contribution to those objectives.
The implementation of the development plan:
- 1 The manager will be in charge of administrative planning and delegating work roles
- 2 The Academic Coordinator will be responsible for organizing the work teams.
- 3 Department of institutional educational project PEI: This will seek to improve the areas of area and classroom, objectives or skills articulated with quality standards.
- 4 Department of strategies: this will look for significant experiences in teaching.
- 5 Evaluation Department: this will defend the ways of evaluating students.
- 6 Department of monitoring: This will be responsible for measuring progress in the development plan.
- 7 Department of statistics: This department will take care of measuring what was also in the tests.
- 8 Department of tool and actions for the improvement of quality: In this you must set monthly dates, or by academic periods to verify among all how the plan goes.
Audit by Xiomara Quintin
An audit will reveal both strengths and weaknesses of the institution at the time. It will thus enable decisions to be made concerning priorities for action and will require examination of the match between the resources that are available and intended provision.
Measure compliance with the following requirements:
School Management
Professional performance
Of the directors
Of the teachers
One of the main instruments to review is the curriculum, there must be stipulated that activities promote the importance of pupil attitude and motivation and The need to have high life expectations.
The institutional curricular emphasis is a specific disciplinary field (or a part of that field), in which it is intended to specialize the teaching-learning process so that the student, upon graduation, has a highly identifiable profile with which to perform in the future.
Each institution should have an emphasis such as: pedagogic, business, technical, agricultural. etc. so it must be observed how is the management within the specific areas so that the student is linked with the emphasis of the institution.
Verification of the plan:
In this last part an evaluation is made only to the
plan to verify how successful, what impact it produced, what were its strengths
and weaknesses so that in the next period these observations are adjusted and a
short term improvement is achieved, the idea is to go Improving little by
little, because the quality of teaching depends on the success of the
development plan.
References:
1.MEN Educational
Management 2007: https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/article-137440.html
2.MEN The way of
educational management 2007: https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/article-137437.html
3. Thomas Vásquez, Evaluation
and monitoring 2008: http://agenda21escolar.absostenible.es/index.php?id=87
4. Leadership and Strategic
Management in Education .Autor: Bush, Tony, Coleman, Marianne (200) Recovered by the Unad library.
